In a recent contribution to the 2010 Nation Branding Debate, titled
“A branding bridge too far for a demoralized nation”, a senior Business Day
analyst argued that South Africa is “a country in crisis”, faces “a political,
institutional and social crisis of unprecedented proportions” where
“retributive justice has become the norm … local government has become
ineffective … and crime is rampant and getting worse”, concluding that “a
branding exercise similar to Germany’s, with its concomitant successes, is
simply not possible in SA”.
Whilst correct in pointing out South
Africa’s current brand gap in delivering the national brand promise of being
‘Alive with Possibility’ (borne out by the fact that SA has dropped from 22nd
to 37th place in the Nation Brand Index), the conclusion of
dismissing 2010 as an opportunity to rebrand the country is missing the second dimension
of nation branding, that is fostering social cohesion, which is a critical component
in validating a country’s external reputation.
The
Social Dimension of Crime
At the recent seminar "Policing in
South Africa: Key Issues and Developments", Temba Mathe of the National
Secretariat for Safety and Security told delegates the fact that more than 70
percent of rapes and about 80 percent of murders happened among people who knew
each other reinforced the importance of social crime-prevention initiatives: "Because
crime is a social problem, [there] has to be a social solution involving more
players than just the police."
Institute for Security Studies senior
researcher Johan Burger concurred with Mathe, saying that the police were often
expected to deliver on unrealistic expectations: "Something
is clearly wrong in how we deal with our crime and the fact that we expect
the police to deal with crime on our behalf."
It is becoming increasingly clear that a
social cohesion deficit lies at the root of our current crime epidemic and that
it is many times the low levels of self-esteem that compel ordinary people to
resort to violence in an effort to assert themselves.
Reversing
the Lucifer Effect
In his recent publication on “The
Lucifer Effect: Understanding how Good People turn Evil”, Professor
Zimbardo from Stanford University, having analysed the abuse of Iraqi prisoners
at Abu Graib in 2003, asks the question ‘Who is responsible for creating and
maintaining the conditions (that led to the horrific levels of abuse)?’ Zimbardo,
who conducted an official investigation into the Abu Graib incidents, concludes
that of the seven factors leading to the abuse of prisoners, only one was
dispositional, i.e. personal failure, whilst the other six were situational,
i.e. systemic problems that resulted in creating the volatile environment
experienced. He recommends that rather than singling out the “bad apples”, as then
US Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, did, we should ask “What is to
blame?” and analyze the behavioral context that resulted in producing “bad
apples”, in other words the “bad barrel”.
Fixing Broken Windows
This is the question
that drove the newly appointed New York City Police Commissioner, Bill Bratton,
in 1994 to turn New York from the worst into the safest large city in the US – in just over two years and without an increase in his budget. Within
his tenure, murders dropped 64.3 percent and total crimes fell by almost half.
The approach
adopted by Bill Bratton in reversing
Kelling was
hired by the New York Transit Authority to put the Broken Windows theory into
practice for the subway fleet, at a time when every one of the 6,000 cars was
covered with graffiti - top to bottom, inside and out. Fare-beating was so
commonplace that it was costing the city as much as $150 million in lost
revenue annually, and there were about 15,000 felonies on the subway a year.
Many subway
advocates, at the time, told Kelling not to worry about graffiti, to focus on
the larger questions of crime and subway reliability, and it seemed like
reasonable advice. Worrying about graffiti at a time when the entire system was
close to collapse seemed as pointless as scrubbing the decks of the Titanic as
it headed toward the icebergs.
But Kelling
insisted. "The
graffiti was symbolic of the collapse of the system," he says.
"When you looked at the process of rebuilding the organization and morale,
you had to win the battle against graffiti. Without winning that battle, all
the management reforms and physical changes just weren’t going to happen. We
were about to put out new trains that were worth about ten million bucks
apiece, and unless we did something to protect them, we knew just what would
happen. They would last one day and then they would be vandalized." He made
it a rule that there should be no retreat, that once a car was
"reclaimed" it should never be allowed to be vandalized again.
"We were religious about it."
By restoring
order train by train and enabling the community to reclaim a public space that
was part of their daily lives, Kelling and Bratton managed to reduce subway
crime dramatically and restore civic pride in this vital means of public
transportation.
Civic Pride key to Crime Prevention
What are the
broken windows in South Africa that need fixing in order to reclaim our public
spaces and restore personal safety and security? According to the National
Prosecuting Authority (NPA), civic pride alone is capable of reducing key crime
indices by up to 40% - if we are to afford each other the opportunity of
depositing rather than withdrawing our personal significance accounts, whether
it is the next time you are interacting with the petrol attendant or addressing
your employees.
As the great Russian writer Alexandre
Solzhenitsyn, a long-time prisoner under Stalin himself, put it, “the
line between good and evil cuts through every human heart." Maybe we
are all responsible for creating the conditions that have led to the current
crime levels in
Recent Comments